two cone flight over chita city 1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window. 2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me. 3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed. 5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm). 6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house. The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations. PS Translated using online translator.
| Date |
District | |
| Country | RU |
| Source | MUFON |
| Source ID | 88229 |
Media
two cone flight over chita city
1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window.
2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me.
3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed.
5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm).
6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house.
The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations.
PS Translated using online translator.
MUFON-88229 - 88229_submitter_file1__IMG1806.JPG
two cone flight over chita city
1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window.
2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me.
3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed.
5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm).
6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house.
The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations.
PS Translated using online translator.
MUFON-88229 - 88229_submitter_file2__IMG1807.JPG
two cone flight over chita city
1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window.
2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me.
3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed.
5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm).
6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house.
The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations.
PS Translated using online translator.
MUFON-88229 - 88229_submitter_file3__IMG1808.JPG
two cone flight over chita city
1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window.
2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me.
3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed.
5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm).
6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house.
The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations.
PS Translated using online translator.
MUFON-88229 - 88229_submitter_file4__IMG1809.JPG
two cone flight over chita city
1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window.
2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me.
3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed.
5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm).
6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house.
The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations.
PS Translated using online translator.
MUFON-88229 - 88229_submitter_file5__IMG1810.JPG
two cone flight over chita city
1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window.
2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me.
3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed.
5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm).
6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house.
The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations.
PS Translated using online translator.
MUFON-88229 - 88229_submitter_file6__IMG1811.JPG
two cone flight over chita city
1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window.
2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me.
3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed.
5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm).
6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house.
The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations.
PS Translated using online translator.
MUFON-88229 - 88229_submitter_file7__IMG1812.JPG
two cone flight over chita city
1. I was in my apartment and sometimes looked out the window.
2. I saw two slowly moving object. A few weeks ago I've seen such objects, but I had no camera with me.
3.4. The objects were like inverted cone without a top. Bottom was glowing red or orange. Objects moving one behind the other on a small distance between them with a constant speed.
5. I freaked out, took the camera and took a few shots (canon 40d\tamron 70-300mm).
6. The objects disappeared behind a neighboring house.
The footage only one object, but actually it is two almost identical object. On pictures 1812 and 1813 two different objects. Since they are perpendicular to enter the house. If you build a trajectory that they go to different places of the house. And the time between photos from 4 seconds. It turns out that a single object disappeared behind a house and 4 seconds other behind the house. This corresponds to a speed which I observed. If we assume that it is a single object with an interval of 4 seconds, it will be a very small rate that does not match my observations.
PS Translated using online translator.
MUFON-88229 - 88229_submitter_file8__IMG1813.JPG